Amphenol Corporation (NYSE:APH) Q1 2024 Earnings Conference Call April 24, 2024 1:00 PM ET
Company Participants
Craig Lampo – CFO
Adam Norwitt – CEO
Conference Call Participants
Amit Daryanani – Evercore
Luke Junk – Baird
Saree Boroditsky – Jefferies
Wamsi Mohan – Bank of America
Mark Delaney – Goldman Sachs
Steven Fox – Fox Advisors
Joe Cardoso – JPMorgan
William Stein – Truist Securities
Asiya Merchant – Citigroup
Andrew Buscaglia – BNP Paribas
Joe Giordano – TD Cowen
Operator
Hello, and welcome to the First Quarter Earnings Conference Call for Amphenol Corporation. Following today’s presentation, there will be a formal question-and-answer session. Until then, all lines will remain in a listen-only mode. At the request of the company, today’s conference is being recorded. If anyone has any objections, you may disconnect at this time.
I would now like to introduce today’s conference host, Mr. Craig Lampo. Sir, you may begin.
Craig Lampo
Thank you very much. Good afternoon, everyone. This is Craig Lampo, Amphenol’s CFO, and I’m here together with Adam Norwitt, our CEO. We would like to welcome you to our first quarter of 2024 conference call.
Our first quarter 2024 results were released this morning and I will provide some financial commentary, and then Adam will give an overview of the business and current market trends. Then we will take questions.
As a reminder, during the call, we may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures and make certain forward-looking statements. So please refer to the relevant disclosures in our press release for further information.
The company closed the first quarter with sales of $3,256 million and adjusted diluted EPS of $0.80. First quarter sales were up 9% in U.S. dollars, 10% in local currencies and 6% organically, compared to the first quarter of 2023.
Sequentially, sales were down 2% in U.S. dollars, 2% in local currencies and 4% organically. Adam will comment further on trends by market in a few minutes. Orders in the quarter were $3,348 million, up 16%, compared to the first quarter of 2023 and 66% sequentially, resulting in a book-to-bill ratio of 1.03:1.
GAAP and adjusted operating income was $685 million, and operating margin was 21% in the first quarter of 2024. On a GAAP basis, operating margin increased by 110 basis points compared to the first quarter of 2023 and 30 basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.
On an adjusted basis, operating margin increased by 90 basis points from the prior year quarter and decreased by 20 basis points sequentially. The year-over-year increase in adjusted operating margin was primarily driven by strong operating leverage on higher sales volumes, which was partially offset by the dilutive impact of acquisitions completed in the prior 12 months.
On a sequential basis, the modest decrease in adjusted operating margin reflected better-than-typical conversion on the lower sales levels, partially offset by the dilutive impact of acquisitions made in the fourth quarter. We are very proud of the company’s operating margin performance, which reflects the continued strong execution of our teams.
Breaking down the first quarter results by segment, relative to the first quarter of 2023, sales in Harsh Environment Solutions segment were $916 million and increased by 7% in U.S. dollars and 3% organically and segment operating margin was 26.7%.
Sales in the Communications Solutions segment were $1,266 million and increased by 12% in U.S. dollars and 11% organically. Segment operating margin was 22.6%. Sales in the Interconnect and Sensor Systems segment were $1,075 million increased by 8% in U.S. dollars and 2% organically, and segment operating margin was 18.2%.
The company’s GAAP effective tax rate for the first quarter was 16.7%, and the adjusted effective tax rate was 24%, which compared to 20.9% and 24% in the first quarter of 2023, respectively. GAAP diluted EPS was $0.87 in the first quarter of 2024, up 23% compared to the prior year period. And on an adjusted basis, diluted EPS increased 16% to $0.80 compared to $0.69 in the first quarter of 2023. This was an excellent result.
Operating cash flow in the first quarter was $599 million or 120% of adjusted net income. And net of capital spending, our free cash flow was $506 million or 101% of adjusted net income. We are pleased to have continued to deliver a strong free cash flow yield in the quarter. I would note here that we may see slightly elevated levels of CapEx in the coming couple of quarters as we invest to support some of the growth that we are seeing in certain markets.
From a working capital standpoint, inventories days, days sales outstanding and payable days were 89, 70 and 53 days, respectively, all within the normal levels. During the quarter, the company repurchased 1.4 million shares of common stock at an average price of approximately $108. When combined with our normal quarterly dividend, total capital returned to shareholders in the first quarter of 2024 was $286 million.
During the month of April, the company repurchased the remaining authorized amount of stock under its existing $2 billion stock repurchase plan, thus completing the plan. And as noted in today’s earnings release, the company’s Board of Directors has approved a new $2 billion three-year open-market stock repurchase plan.
Total debt on March 31 was $4.3 billion, and net debt was $2.3 billion. Total liquidity at the end of the quarter was $5.7 billion, which included cash and short-term investments on hand of $2 billion plus availability under our existing credit facilities.
First quarter 2024 EBITDA was $810 million. And at the end of the first quarter of 2024, our net leverage was 0.7 times. Following the close of the quarter in April, the company used $350 million in cash on hand to repay its maturing 3.2% U.S. senior notes and our $750 million undrawn term loan matured and was not renewed.
In addition, in early April, we completed a $1.5 billion U.S. bond offering, and the company intends to use the net proceeds from the bond offering, together with cash on hand and other debt financing to fund the company’s pending acquisition of Carlisle Interconnect Technologies, which we continue to expect to close by the end of the second quarter of 2024.
As a result of the U.S. bond offering, we do expect quarterly interest expense to increase to approximately $55 million, although until CIT is closed, we also expect interest income generated from the increased cash balance to offset the increase in interest expense. As such, the impact on earnings will be relatively mutual until the CIT closing occurs. The company is in a very strong financial position, and we are well-positioned to fund future opportunities as they arise.
I will now turn the call over to Adam, who will provide some commentary on market trends.
Adam Norwitt
Well, thank you very much, Craig, and I’d like to extend my warmest welcome to all of you here from beautiful Wallingford, Connecticut, where spring is certainly in the air.
As you know, as is typical, I’m going to highlight some of our achievements in the first quarter. I’ll then discuss our trends and our progress across our diversified markets. Finally, I’ll comment on the outlook for the second quarter. And of course, we’ll have time for questions.
Our results in the first quarter were stronger than expected, exceeding the high end of guidance in sales and adjusted diluted earnings per share. We’re very pleased that our sales grew from prior year by 9% in U.S. dollars and 10% in local currencies, reaching $3.256 billion.
On an organic basis, our sales increased by 6% with growth in IT datacom, commercial air, automotive, defense and mobile devices markets, somewhat offset by declines in the mobile networks, broadband and industrial markets. And I’ll talk about each of those markets here in a few moments.
We’re very pleased that the company booked $3.348 billion in orders in the first quarter and that that represented a positive book-to-bill of 1.03:1. Our profitability was very strong in the quarter, and adjusted operating margins reached 21% even in the quarter, a robust 90 basis point increase from last year’s levels.
And from that profitability, we generated adjusted diluted EPS, which grew 16% from prior year to $0.80. Finally, we generated strong operating and free cash flow of $599 million and $506 million, another clear demonstration of the high quality of the company’s earnings.
As Craig mentioned, we’re very pleased that the Board of Directors has approved a new $2 billion three-year stock repurchase program, and this represents another important component of the company’s balanced capital deployment. I’m extremely proud of our global team of Amphenolians. The company’s results this quarter once again reflect the discipline and agility of our entrepreneurial organization, who continued to perform very well in the most dynamic of environment.
Now, as we announced on January 30, just after our Q4 earnings, we’re very pleased to have signed an agreement to acquire Carlisle Interconnect Technologies business for $2 billion in cash. CIT, as it is known, is a leading global supplier of harsh environment interconnect solutions, primarily to the commercial air, defense and industrial end markets, with approximately 6,000 employees worldwide.
The company’s wide range of products, including wire and cable, cable assemblies, contacts, connectors and sensors are highly complementary to Amphenol’s existing interconnect and sensor solutions. As previously announced, CIT is expected to have annual sales of approximately $900 million in 2024 with an EBITDA margin of approximately 20%.
We do continue to anticipate that the transaction will be completed by the end of this second quarter. Accordingly and based on CIT’s current operating performance, we do expect this acquisition to add roughly $0.02 to earnings in the second half of 2024, excluding acquisition-related costs.
As we look forward to welcoming the outstanding CIT team to Amphenol, I remain confident that our acquisition program will continue to create great value for the company. Our ability to identify and execute upon acquisitions really of all sizes, and to successfully bring these new companies into Amphenol remains a core competitive advantage for the company. As our organization has evolved and scaled, so too has our ability to effectively manage a greater number of acquisitions of all sizes.
Now turning to our progress across our served markets. I would just comment that we continue to be pleased that the company’s end market exposure remains highly diversified, balanced and broad. This diversification continues to create great value for Amphenol, enabling us to participate across all areas of the global electronics industry while not being disproportionately exposed to the risks associated with any given market or application.
So starting out with the defense market. This important market represents 11% of our sales in the quarter and sales grew from prior year by a strong 13% in U.S. dollars and 11% organically, and this was really driven by broad-based growth across most segments within the defense market. Sequentially, our sales were down by 2%, and this was modestly better than our expectations coming into the quarter.
Looking into the second quarter, we expect sales to increase modestly from these first quarter levels. And we remain encouraged by the company’s strengthened position in the defense market, where we continue to offer the industry’s widest range of high-technology interconnect products.
Amidst today’s dynamic geopolitical environment, countries around the world are expanding their investments in both current and next-generation defense technologies, thereby increasing the long-term demand potential for Amphenol. We’re well positioned to accelerate our new product development while also increasing our capacity to support this demand long into the future.
The commercial aerospace market represented 4% of our sales in the quarter. Sales increased by a strong 20%, both in U.S. dollars and organically and that was really driven by broad-based strength across virtually all aircraft applications. Sequentially, our sales grew much better than expected, 11% from the fourth quarter.
As we look into the second quarter, we do expect a modest reduction in sales versus these very strong first quarter levels. I’m just really proud of our team working in the commercial air market. With the ongoing growth in travel and thus demand for jetliners, our efforts to strengthen our breadth of high-technology interconnect products, while diversifying our market position into next-generation aircraft are paying real dividends for the company.
We continue to see great, long-term opportunities for expansion of our technology offering to this important market, including with the CIT acquisition and look forward to realizing the benefits of our growth initiatives for many years to come. The industrial market represented 25% of our sales in the quarter and our sales in this market did decline by 1% in U.S. dollars and 10% organically.
During the quarter, we did see some growth in marine, public safety, rail mass transit and oil and gas applications, but that was more than offset by moderating performance, particularly in battery and electric heavy vehicles, instrumentation and factory automation. On a sequential basis, we were pleased that sales were up 6% from the fourth quarter a bit better than our expectations, but that growth was really driven by our acquisitions completed in the fourth quarter.
Looking into the second quarter, we expect sales in the industrial market to remain at similar levels as here in the first quarter. And despite this near-term positive demand, I remain proud of our outstanding global team working in the industrial market. And I’m confident that our long-term strategy to expand our high-technology interconnect antenna and sensor offering, both organically and through complementary acquisitions has positioned us to capitalize on the many electronic revolutions that will no doubt continue to occur across the industrial market.
The automotive market represented 24% of our sales in the first quarter. And sales in the first quarter grew 18% in U.S. dollars and 17% organically. That was really driven by broad-based strength across most automotive applications, including especially communications-related applications as well as electric and hybrid electric vehicle drive trains.
Sequentially, our sales declined by 3% from the fourth quarter, which was better than our expectations, and that reflected strong execution by our team working in the automotive market. As we head into the second quarter, we do expect a modest sequential decline in sales. But I’m just so proud of our team working in the automotive market.
Our continued and clear outperformance is yet another confirmation of the benefit of our team’s focus on driving new design wins with customers who are implementing a wide array of new technologies into their vehicles. And while that includes electrified drive trains, it also includes a multitude of other exciting applications. And we look forward to benefiting from that strong position for many years to come.
The mobile devices market represented 8% of our sales in the quarter. Our sales were flat from prior year in U.S. dollars, but grew 2% organically as growth in laptops and smartphones was offset by declines in tablets, wearables and other products.
Sequentially, our sales declined by a better-than-expected 29%, compared to the fourth quarter. As we head into the second quarter, we now expect a mid-single-digit sales decline from these first quarter levels, as customers prepare for new model launches in the second half of 2024. While mobile devices will no doubt always remain one of our most volatile markets, our outstanding and agile team is poised as always to capture any opportunities for incremental sales that may arise in 2024 and beyond.
Our leading array of antennas, interconnect products and mechanisms continues to enable a broad range of next-generation mobile devices, which positions us well for the long-term. The mobile networks market represented 3% of our sales in the quarter, and sales did decline from prior year by 13% in U.S. dollars and 25% organically, as we continue to manage through a broad-based reduction in spending by network operators and wireless equipment manufacturers.
Sequentially though, we were pleased to see that our sales did grow by 5% from the fourth quarter, as we had expected, coming into Q1. And as we look into the second quarter, we now expect a high single-digit increase in sales, which does reflect some increased demand that we are seeing from our mobile operator customers.
While no doubt the short-term investment environment in the mobile networks market has been challenging, I can just tell you that our team continues to work aggressively to realize the benefits of our efforts to expand our position in next-generation 5G equipment and networks around the world.
When customers once again drive renewed wireless investments, we look forward to benefiting from the increased potential that comes from our unique position with both, equipment manufacturers and mobile service providers. We’re poised to build on that position as wireless technology continues to accelerate long into the future.
The Information Technology and Data Communications market represented 21% of our sales in the quarter. Sales in the first quarter grew by a very strong 29% in U.S. dollars and 28% organically, and this was driven by accelerating demand for our products used in Artificial Intelligence data centers.
On a sequential basis, sales increased by 1% from the fourth quarter, which was substantially better than our expectation for a mid-single-digit decline. We continue to experience strong orders for AI-related interconnect products. And accordingly, as we look into the second quarter, we expect sales to grow in the low double-digit range from these first quarter levels.
I can tell you that we’re more encouraged than ever by the company’s position in the global IT datacom market. Our team continues to do a really outstanding job securing future business on next-generation IT systems, particularly those enabling AI. Indeed, this revolution in AI that we’re all living through right now has created a unique opportunity for Amphenol given our leading high-speed and power interconnect products.
With machine learning driving a more intensive usage of these highest technology interconnect products, we’re very well-positioned for the future. And whether it’s high-speed power or fiber optic interconnect, our products are critical components in these next-generation networks, and that just creates a continued long-term growth opportunity for the company.
The broadband market represented 4% of our sales in the quarter. Sales declined by 19% in U.S. dollars and organically from prior year as broadband operators continued to reduce their procurement levels. On a sequential basis, sales were flat, which was slightly worse than our expectations coming into the quarter. And as we look into the second quarter, we anticipate sales to remain roughly at these first quarter levels.
Yes, regardless of the current demand dynamics in broadband, we do remain encouraged by the company’s strengthened position. We look forward to continuing to support our service provider customers around the world, all of whom are working to increase their network coverage and bandwidth to support the proliferation of high-speed data applications to homes and businesses.
Now turning to our outlook and of course, assuming current market conditions as well as constant exchange rates, for the second quarter, we expect sales in the range of $3.24 billion to $3.30 billion and adjusted diluted EPS in the range of $0.79 to $0.81. This would represent sales growth of 6% to 8% and adjusted diluted EPS growth of 10% to 13% compared to the second quarter of last year. I just wanted to note that as is our usual practice, this guidance does not include acquisitions, which have not yet closed, including CIT.
I remain confident in the ability of our outstanding management team to adapt to the many opportunities and challenges in the current environment and to continue to grow our market position while driving sustainable and strong profitability over the long-term. And finally, I’d just like to take, again, this opportunity to thank the entire global team of Amphenolians around the world, nearly 100,000 of them worldwide for their truly outstanding efforts here in the first quarter.
And with that, operator, we’d be very happy to take any questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Amit Daryanani with Evercore. You may go ahead.
Amit Daryanani
Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. I guess, Adam, AI, you talked a little bit about AI as well, but it’s only a big focus for everyone, including investors. So I’m hoping you could maybe, perhaps, help us understand what solutions, what products does Amphenol really sell to the customer base right now when it comes to AI infrastructure and how does that really differ from what you sell to processor companies versus the cloud providers that are running their own infrastructure? I’d love to just understand that and if there’s any way to put dimensions around how big this business can get for you folks over time would be really helpful. Thank you.
Adam Norwitt
Well, thanks very much, Amit, and really appreciate the question. Look, we’re really excited about the renewed and really revolutionary investments that are being made in AI right now. I mean I have to confess that I am a consumer of these products. I’ve been using them. It’s amazing. Last night, my wife made me tacos because, of course, it’s Tuesday, and she went on ChatGPT. And she said give me a great taco recipe. And it’s just unbelievable what you can do for these things.
And the underlying magic of these systems is just extraordinary computations, creating essentially probability models that are based on comparing everything to everything else. And to do that, you need the chips, whether they’d be GPUs or TPUs or tensor or whatever the chips that there are, they need to be connected to each other in essentially a fabric network.
And these calculations and computations and comparisons have to happen virtually at light speed. And thus, that requires an enormous degree of high-speed, low latency interconnect products that are different in their architecture.
You have much more use, for example, of cable assemblies than you did in the past using maybe printed circuit boards, you have really direct connecting as close as possible to the chip of those high-speed products. And these are extraordinarily challenging products to build. These are products that we’ve been working on for so many years. I mean, more than a decade of effort in developing these products. And they’re just extremely challenging, extremely high technology and extremely critical to the good performance of those products.
But it doesn’t just start and end with high speed. I think it’s been broadly discussed lately, power and what does power mean for AI. And is there even enough power in the world to energize these AI data centers that people are talking about.
And so you can imagine that there’s an enormous focus as well on the efficiency of the power interconnect in these systems. And that’s another area where Amphenol is participating with some of our leading-edge power interconnect, whether that’s connectors, cable assemblies, bus bars and all the like.
And then there’s obviously fiber optics and the fact of using optical interfaces, whether those are active or passive fiber optic products, those are all things that we can offer to our customers. And we have the broadest deepest highest technology offering into the data center market. We’ve been working and preparing for kind of this moment for so many years as we’ve been developing the sort of type of interconnect architecture that needs to be used. And fortunately, over the last kind of five quarters or so, that’s really taken hold.
And I think it’s – this AI seems to really have a lot of value for the end users, it seems to draw an enormous amount of investment in capital, maybe, by the way, even a little bit of cannibalizing of capital from more traditional data centers. And it’s not just about having the right products, but it’s also about being able to ramp up those products and being able to react quickly to our customers who are really having, in many ways, kind of an arms race.
And when I talked about the IT datacom market, I mentioned all of our growth, and in fact, a little bit more than all of our growth this quarter, which was very substantial growth, 28% organically, came from products that are being integrated into AI data centers. And it’s something that as we look into next quarter, where we still have a favorable view of that, I think our team is realizing the benefits of really a lot of labors for many years in the past.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Luke Junk with Baird. You may go ahead.
Luke Junk
Hi. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. Just hoping, you could help us unpack a little bit more the up-tick in orders and book-to-bill being positive this quarter, just particular areas of strength that are driving that and maybe areas that are still lagging at this point? Thank you.
Adam Norwitt
Well, thanks so much, Luke. First of all, we’re really pleased to see the positive book-to-bill 1.03. I mean, I know during COVID, there were some funny books to bill at a few points where it was like 1.15:1 and then there were some negative book-to-bill. I mean, traditionally, 1.03 is actually a very strong book-to-bill for us because our lead times are not that long. We’re a very reactive company, and I think that’s a really good sign.
It shouldn’t be surprising that maybe the two places where we saw slightly negative book-to-bill would have been in Mobile Networks and Industrial. Otherwise, we saw either flat or positive book-to-bill and probably our strongest bookings on a book-to-bill came out of IT Datacom as well as Commercial Air, which were really good books to bill.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Saree Boroditsky with Jefferies. You may go ahead.
Saree Boroditsky
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to dig in more on the Carlisle, CIT, acquisition. It’s relatively large. It was held by a commercial roofing company before. So what’s the opportunity here being under – your ownership? And where do you see potential to improve margins? Thank you.
Adam Norwitt
Well, thank you very much, Saree. I mean first, I just want to complement Carlisle, the corporation we – I work closely with the CEO of Carlisle, who’s a wonderful guy. It’s a fabulous company actually.
And it’s true. Their focus and their stated strategic focus is to be in the building materials industry. And they were a wonderful steward of Carlisle Interconnect for many years. But there’s no doubt that Interconnect was not where they were focused strategically.
And I’m really pleased and happy for the team. The corporate team at Carlisle, because I think they’ve really been able to realize their vision to be a focused building materials company, at the same time, Carlisle Interconnect is a fabulous company. I’ve known this company for most of my quarter century in Amphenol. It’s one of those companies that we actually don’t compete with them very much, very little, actually. It’s such a complementary company, but I’ve always admired the company.
And we’ve always admired the company for their great technology, fabulous people. And I’ve known some of the people at CIT also for many, many years. And I just can’t tell you how happy I am, that they’re going to be on our side of the table, but they’re going to join the Amphenol family. And that’s really just – it’s such a fabulous organization inside of CIT.
I mean what we really love about this company, they are a true leader in the technologies around wire and cable, in cable assemblies, in contact technologies, which is just so complementary to our leadership position on connectors and other value-add Interconnect on things like backshells and the like.
And when we bring that together, that offering to customers whether that’s in the Commercial Air market, whether that’s in the Defense market, whether that’s in certain segments of the Industrial Market where they participate, we will be able to bring a total solution to those customers at a time when those customers really want to have reliable partners.
I mean you think about some of the dynamics that are evident, for example, in Commercial Air, the reliability of your partners is an enormous premium in these things. I mean you’re making critical devices, airplanes that hundreds of passengers go on and being able to go to one company and say, can you bring us a total set of solutions for our interconnect needs, that has a really, really wonderful and comforting dynamic for the customers.
In terms of the profitability, CIT is a great company. It is operated in a bit of a holding company structure. I can tell you that we, in Amphenol, have a lot of different sister companies, brother companies around the world who have figured out lots of tricks of the trade of accessing low-cost manufacturing of helping to reduce the supply chain and all of that.
And while the CIT team, they’re going to still run this company. It’s not like we’re going to parachute a bunch of folks into CIT and say, go run it on their behalf. It’s the quite the contrary. I mean, the existing management team is going to stay running that company as part of Amphenol, but they will be able to avail themselves of experience of collaborative interactions with folks around Amphenol that in our experience, ultimately leads to better performance.
We’ve had a good track record and some may call it a great track record of buying companies that were great companies with great technology, great people, that just were maybe part of the wrong parent company, all the way back to early 19 years ago when we acquired Teradyne Connection Systems from Teradyne Corporation. Again, Teradyne is an outstanding company in the test and measurement industry, but they were not an interconnect company.
When we acquired the Advanced Sensors business from GE, and again, GE is an outstanding company. And just as you know, they focus now, and it’s now GE Aerospace, it’s a wonderful company, but they were not an interconnect company. And here again, with MTS, the company that we acquired in 2021, another example of a great company that ultimately was not an interconnector in that case, a sensor company.
I think as part of now an interconnect company where they really belong, I have really high hopes long-term for the progress that the CIT team will make. This will not come overnight. There’s no doubt about it. That takes time. And we’re patient in that respect, but we’re very hopeful and we have really a strong vision for the future of this company as part of the Amphenol family.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America. You may go ahead.
Wamsi Mohan
Yes. Thank you so much. Adam, maybe back to this AI topic a little bit. Thanks for all the color you shared. Clearly, Amphenol has been in this space for a long time, and you continue to push the envelope both in terms of data speeds and signal integrity issues. So, can you just talk about how you’re seeing pricing evolves, maybe generation to generation? What’s been the history there? How are you anticipating that given the higher value and kind of much more – transmitting 800 gig instead of 400 gig speeds? So clearly, there’s value in there, but the density of applications is becoming more complicated and the unit volumes are also growing kind of order of magnitude higher.
So putting all those together, how should we think about just the opportunity here? Is it right to think about maybe – you just – you’re guiding to like a 30% growth in this end market right here in the next quarter. Is that something that’s possible to continue into 2025? Thank you so much.
Adam Norwitt
Well, thanks, Wamsi. A lot wrapped up in that question. I mean, look, I guess, to the very end of your question, I’m not going to get out ahead of myself and try to give a guidance about this revolutionary thing into 2025. As you know, we give guidance for the quarter ahead of us, and then we try to make sure we’re maximizing our position of whatever the market will bring us long term.
But I would say this, number one, you mentioned pricing. I mean we are always trying to deliver to our customers’ value and so our goal is to deliver the maximum amount of value to our customers at the lowest price that they can get. And if we can deliver enough value to our customers, then there will be some of that value left over for us.
And I think what you see in AI is the criticality of the interconnect in these systems. I mean there is a direct correlation between the power of these AI learning and inference models and the quality and performance and capability of the interconnect systems because, again, you’re talking about speed and latency.
And so when you think about how long does it take to build a model, well, if you have even the tiniest proportion of higher latency between the chips then all of a sudden, what may take a month, takes three months to build these complex models that are using trillions of learning factors across them. And if you take three months and your competitor takes 1 month, and your model is more up-to-date than your competitors, all of a sudden you as a service provider are not able to monetize these massive investments that you’re making.
So if you think about that correlation between the speed and the latency and then, in fact, the economics of the models, you can understand that there is a lot of value embedded in our products as it relates to what it creates in terms of functionality for our customers. And whether that’s at the chip processor level, whether that’s inside the data centers, with the cloud operators, whatever that is.
There’s no doubt about it that we have to build also our capacity and that these are extremely high-precision products. They require intensity of testing. They require intensity of automation. Craig, I think, alluded to in his prepared remarks a little bit that we might see a couple of quarters of a little bit more CapEx, not just for this market, but for other markets as well. But this is one of those areas where we’re really building up phenomenal capabilities.
And I just have to take one last moment here and answer your question. Like everything that I’m talking about, it’s easy for me to say all these things. I can’t tell you how hard our team is working to execute on these words. I mean, again, these are complex products with complex production processes, complex systems, extremely high reliability, a lot at stake because of those underlying economics.
And boy, I have rarely been as grateful as I am to those folks who are working 24/7 across Amphenol around the world to really ramp up in support of our customers that are implementing these AI data centers.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Mark Delaney with Goldman Sachs. You may go ahead.
Mark Delaney
Yes, good afternoon. Thanks very much for taking my question. I’m hoping to better understand how Amphenol is thinking about capital allocation for the rest of the year, especially with the pending Carlisle Interconnect transaction. Is the M&A funnel still active? And with the new repurchase authorization you announced this morning, but also the potential cash usage for M&A, so just Carlisle, how active might the company be on buybacks this year?
Craig Lampo
Yes. Thanks a lot, Mark. Yes, I think in regards to our capital deployment, we’ve had a very consistent policy and practice over many years with regard to our capital deployment and over a whole host of years where we’ve done a significant amount of M&A and less M&A, and we continue to be kind of – it continues to be a balanced and flexible deployment strategy.
In the current year with the CIT, I talked about how strong our balance sheet is, the 0.7 times net leverage, the strong free cash flow that we generate and continue to generate. And so I wouldn’t think even with CIT, I wouldn’t say that, that would have any impact ultimately on our capital deployment strategy. And we did just renew or have a new $2 billion three-year share repurchase program. Certainly, that’s one of the legs and a return of capital to shareholders.
Ultimately, over time, we want to return about 50% or roughly half of our free cash flow to our shareholders. And part of that is our dividend yield, which is roughly 1%, and we continue to target that over time as well as our share repurchase plan. So, I would say this new plan is just consistent with that and our dividend certainly policy is consistent with that. And ultimately, that M&A continues to be the focus that ultimately over time, we believe that, that will continue to drive strong returns.
So if there was a time where we generated a significant closing of deals in this particular year, what we think about maybe dialing back share repurchases. But at the end of the day, just considering the significant free cash flow that we generate, we really haven’t had to do that and certainly wouldn’t expect this year just with CIT to have to have any adjustment to that.
Adam Norwitt
And Mark, relative to the M&A pipeline, I would just tell you that our pipeline remains strong. Yes, we completed last year, 10 acquisitions. Yes, we announced in January, our largest ever acquisition was CIT. But I can tell you, we have the appetite, the capacity and the ability and agility to continue to make acquisitions large and small. And I think we continue to demonstrate our ability to do more acquisitions, do bigger acquisitions. And the beauty of this industry and the beauty of this market is that, there’s just so many great opportunities to find companies with great people and great technology and a very complementary market position to Amphenol.
We remain extremely disciplined in our acquisition program, and we will walk away for – if we get a bad feeling up until the last second before we wire money, but there’s no doubt about it that there’s great, great opportunities for us for the future. And as Craig mentioned, like our financial condition is in really a fantastic position with 0.7 times leverage here at the end of the quarter. Our leverage will just be a touch above 1, following the acquisition of CIT. And so we have really the capacity, the capability and the appetite to continue.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Steven Fox with Fox Advisors. You may go ahead.
Steven Fox
Hi, good afternoon. I was just wondering on the auto markets, the 17% growth you talked about. I know you highlighted communications. And I know you guys don’t like to count cars per se, but can you just sort of provide some color on the backdrop you’re selling into right now and into Q2? And what exactly would you call out as sort of leading products that you’re, especially doing well on right now? Thanks.
Adam Norwitt
Yes. Thanks very much, Steve. And you’re right. I don’t like counting cars necessarily. I mean, the market is what the market is. But look, we have taken advantage, I think, for a very long time, not of an overall growing auto market. I mean, if you look over, I don’t know, eight years or something, it’s still sort of a similar level of total worldwide auto production. But there’s no doubt that the content has expanded dramatically over these years. And I think we’ve taken a real advantage of that.
So when we think about our opportunities, we talked a lot over the past years about electrified drivetrains, the high-voltage connectors, for example, sensors that go into that. But we’ve also talked about all the other applications. And so when you think about communications, as I highlighted earlier, there’s just more and more communications technology being put into cars. And as a leader in RF technology for cars, as a leader in antennas for cars, as someone who participates really across that whole signal chain of communication that creates a great opportunity.
There’s other areas like connectivity, passenger connectivity, engine control. By the way, there’s still the vast majority of cars that are built are using fuel-based engines or ICE vehicles and those require an enormous amount of different contents as well. Most of actually what we sell into cars is agnostic to the drivetrain. But it’s not agnostic to the increase in content in cars. As there’s more electronics, there’s going to be more opportunities for Amphenol.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Samik Chatterjee with JPMorgan. You may go ahead.
Joe Cardoso
Hi. Thanks for the question. This is Joe Cardoso on for Samik. Can you just give us an update on where we stand on the inventory destocking headwinds in the industrial market and how you’re thinking about timing of when we see that normalizing? And then maybe as a quickie second, if I can. Can you just touch on the CapEx investments that you highlighted in your prepared remarks? How should we be thinking about magnitude and besides IT datacom that you mentioned, what are the other major buckets of investments there? Thank you.
Adam Norwitt
Yes. I mean just very quickly on industrial. I mean, I think we continue to see the demand in industrial to be somewhat muted. There is no doubt an impact from destocking with distributors. But it’s not just destocking. I think distributors orders themselves are also down. And so, it’s not just that they have too much inventory, but the demand in certain pockets of industrial. I would say, in particular, in places like Europe, maybe to a lesser extent in some parts of Asia and then even to a lesser extent, in North America.
With regards to our comments on CapEx, I mean, I talked about it in the context of AI. But you can imagine, we’re growing strongly in a number of our markets, including, in particular, in defense. We grew last year in Defense by 20%. We grew last quarter by 11% organically. We continue to see strong momentum. And the defense industry uses also extremely high-technology products. We have a very vertically integrated capability and offering to our customers.
And usually, you can’t grow by 20% in defense-related products. It’s just impossible to flex. And I think our team has just done a fabulous job of flexing their capacity. But that may require a little bit more. But look, we’re not talking about big numbers here. I mean we said we expect a slight elevation in CapEx. Our CapEx is still very, very reasonable. I think, Craig, it was less than 3% last quarter.
Craig Lampo
Yes.
Adam Norwitt
And so this is not a big deal. We expect to still have very strong and robust free cash flow through the year.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from William Stein with Truist Securities. You may go ahead.
William Stein
Great. Thanks for taking my question. I’m going to ask yet another on AI. We understand that the three main connector vendors in the space, Amphenol and two others have very solid positions, very good technical capabilities. I’m wondering, if you can talk about the competitive dynamics among the three of you. And also, the degree to which you can capture some of their share or whether it’s possible, another entrant among the hundreds of connector companies globally could realistically attack this market? Yes. Thank you.
Adam Norwitt
Thanks very much, Will. Look, I’m not going to comment on our peers. I have great respect for them. They’re fabulous companies. What I will say is that we’ve been working in this area for a very, very long time.
And as the leader in high-speed interconnect technology, you can imagine that we also have a very robust position here. This is not something that we have just recently developed. This is a very, very long intensive and real leading position in development of those technologies. But I have great respect for all of our competitors. This AI is a great thing for our industry, because it is really a multiple of content, because of the unique architecture of these products.
And we’re not going to win 100% of everything, but I can tell you that we certainly get more than our fair share. In terms of new entrants, I mean, look, there can always be new folks who come along, these are among the hardest products that are made in the interconnect industry. And I think I already spent some time talking about the economics of those products and how those economics mean that as a customer, you want to be very careful to not use a product that cannot meet the requirements that you need in these high-performance systems.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Asiya Merchant with Citigroup. You may go ahead.
Asiya Merchant
Great. Thanks for taking my question and great results. Just incremental gross margins, if I did the calculation here, right, we’re – sorry, operating margins are very strong. Maybe you can talk about how you guys think about the trajectory of those gross – incremental margins as the quarter progresses or as the year progresses, and especially when you think about rolling in a pretty sizable acquisition in the back half, how we should be modeling for that? Thank you.
Craig Lampo
Yes. Thanks, Asiya. Yes. No, we are really proud of the 21% operating margins here in the first quarter. I mean, first quarter typically is the more challenging quarter in the years given the sequential quarter typical decline we have. And certainly, we always do a good job. But this quarter really, I think, is an outstanding quarter from being able to achieve 21% – 30% year-over-year and really sequentially about 30%.
And that’s – we did 10 acquisitions last year, as you know, and those acquisitions were significantly under our company average. So when you really pullout and look at the organic conversion on our 6% growth on a year-over-year basis, it’s significantly stronger than the 30% that kind of in the reported numbers.
And sequentially, kind of the same dynamic with the acquisitions we did in the fourth quarter, being well under the average profitability of the company sequentially that conversion really is well under that 30%, kind of in the face.
So really strong execution by the team, I mean, the team has done an outstanding job of really not only the teams that are growing, but also the teams that are impacted on the negative side. As you know, our industrial market is more challenged and a few other markets as well. And they’ve just done an outstanding job of controlling costs on the downside as well. So the combination of those two really has just turned into a really strong profitability for the company.
I mean as we look forward, taking out CIT, I’ll talk about that in a second. I would expect that, again, more normal profitability levels on incremental kind of revenue. If we talk about the 25% longer-term target, I would expect more in that normal range as we kind of get into more of the normal cadence from a pricing cost perspective that we’re in right now. But no doubt our teams will continue to manage in a very strong level and do their best to maximize profitability as they have. But I think 25% or so is kind of what I would kind of expect as we kind of go throughout the year.
Now when we layer in CIT, when CIT does close, we expect here by the end of Q2, there’s no doubt that business is well under our average company profitability levels currently and there would be some impact on the profitability, on the margins slightly from an operating margin perspective. And over time, we would certainly work and the team would work as Adam kind of mentioned earlier, to get those back up to the company average. But certainly, in 2024, we would expect some impact on the second half from a profitability perspective from them. But it’s a great team, and certainly, we would expect over time to improve upon that.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question is from Andrew Buscaglia with BNP Paribas. You may go ahead.
Andrew Buscaglia
Hi, good afternoon, guys.
Adam Norwitt
Good afternoon.
Andrew Buscaglia
Yes. Following up on that question, CIT, I think at a great price. As part of a holding company, you guys alluded to maybe not run optimally. But is this integration, is this company a cost-saving story? Or if you look at CIT, their growth, historically, wasn’t all that exciting. Is this more of an opportunity to reaccelerate their growth? Or is it both? And if you could comment like that potential margin dilution in the back half, what might that be at this point?
Adam Norwitt
Yes. I don’t know that we have a specific number to give you for the margin dilution. I mean, we’ll talk about it when we own the company. In terms of the priorities, I mean, every acquisition we make we want them to accelerate their growth and make more money doing it. And so you can imagine that with the CIT team we’re already talking about, to the extent that we can before closing, we’re already talking about how do they both accelerate their growth, expand their market position, take advantage of being part of Amphenol, take advantage of the broader access that we have as a company, take advantage of the broader suite of technologies that we have to grow their business. And in turn, how do they take advantage of our low-cost manufacturing. How do they take advantage of the broader relationships we have in the supply chain, whatever that may be. And also just how do they take advantage of now being part of a high-performance interconnect company like Amphenol?
I will tell you, in years past, when we’ve seen companies improve their performance, some of that was just they came in and they saw, oh my goodness, I didn’t realize I could make that much money. And they just figured it out and made it happen. And it’s not that we parachute in with a bunch of folks from headquarters or otherwise, but there is inside of the company so many great role models of organizations run by entrepreneurs, run by Amphenol and general managers who have just figured it out. And that is – we don’t have an Amphenol business system. We don’t have an Amphenol way. The Amphenol way is just to liberate people, to give them the authority and to hold them accountable as entrepreneurs. And that mindset is very different from most other companies.
And again, Carlisle is a fabulous organization, the parent company, but they’re not an interconnect company. And I think CIT, as part of Amphenol with our unique culture, with our uniquely broad suite of products and relationships, I can’t tell you exactly how they’re going to do it, but I have a lot of confidence that they will.
Operator
Thank you. And our last question comes from Joe Giordano with TD Cowen. You may go ahead.
Joe Giordano
Hi thanks. Just curious like with the AI stuff, is there any inherent margin differential between the products that you’re selling on these next gen technologies versus more traditional data center or versus like more of the company average? And then if I could, I asked your competitor this morning. But when you think about the CapEx that you need to do and the scale of what these customers of yours are thinking over a multiyear period is massive. How do you like bring that down to your own spend and like rationalize? Is this doable? Like how fast do we want to spend ahead of something that might be a five-year story, like how do you balance that?
Adam Norwitt
Yes. Look, I may let Craig comment on the margins, except I mean, it’s an easy answer. It’s just like look, we make margins based on selling value to customers. If we can create value for our customers, then usually there’s value for us to be had there. And I think that’s basically what I would say in this respect.
Relative to scaling and working with our customers, I mean, you can imagine that we have very intensive discussions with our customers in every market. Here, because of the economics behind it, because of the pressure on our customers and the big vision, you can imagine that we’re having even more intensive discussions.
And so this is not just like you get an order and then you say, all right, well, I’m going to go invest XYZ. I mean this is a very iterative, interactive discussion. But it’s all done under the context of the Amphenol approach.
These are – it’s not that we’re making decisions here at headquarters and allocating capital. We have general managers making – and having responsibility for specific products and they’re going to figure out how do they satisfy the customer, but also knowing that it’s their capital that they’re spending.
And if they spend more than they should, that’s going to hit their P&L., not just going to hit Amphenol’s P&L, it’s going to hit their P&L. And that accountability of sort of from birth to death of a program is something that I think is very unique in our organization.
And over time, when I think about why does Amphenol spend what we spend on capital expenditures, it is in large part because the ownership of that, the accountability, the authority for that is resident in individuals who also go to the customer every day, who also are in charge of the factory, who also are in charge of developing the products.
And when you have that comprehensive authority, you tend to make wiser decisions about this. And it’s not like, well, I’m going to overinvest now and let the next person clean it up on my behalf. These folks are there for the long term and they own it all. And I think they’re going to make wise decisions accordingly.
Operator
Thank you. And I’ll now turn the call back over to Mr. Norwitt for any closing remarks.
Adam Norwitt
Well, thank you very much. And again, thanks to everybody for your time today. We appreciate everybody’s attention. And I wish that everybody has a fabulous spring, and we’ll talk to you again in 90 days or so. Take care. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you for attending today’s conference, and have a nice day.
