Tempur Sealy International, Inc. (NYSE:TPX) Q1 2024 Earnings Conference Call May 7, 2024 8:00 AM ET
Company Participants
Aubrey Moore – Investor Relations
Scott Thompson – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Bhaskar Rao – Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Susan Maklari – Goldman Sachs
Bobby Griffin – Raymond James
Rafe Jadrosich – Bank of America
Peter Keith – Piper Sandler
Seth Basham – Wedbush
Michael Lasser – UBS
Brad Thomas – KeyBanc Capital Markets
Keith Hughes – Truist
Phillip Blee – William Blair
Laura Champine – Loop Capital
William Reuter – Bank of America
Brad Thomas – KeyBanc Capital Markets
Operator
Good day, everyone, and welcome to today’s Tempur Sealy International Incorporated Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later you will have the opportunity to ask questions, during the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]
It is now my pleasure to turn the conference over to Aubrey Moore, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Aubrey Moore
Thank you, operator. Good morning, everybody, and thank you for participating in today’s call. Joining me today are Scott Thompson, Chairman, President and CEO; and Bhaskar Rao, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
This call includes forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve uncertainties and actual results may differ materially due to a variety of factors that could adversely affect the company’s business. These factors are discussed in the company’s SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. The company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
This morning’s commentary will also include non-GAAP financial information. Reconciliations of this non-GAAP financial information can be found on the accompanying press release, which is posted on the company’s investor website at investor.tempursealy.com and filed with the SEC. Our comments will supplement the detailed information provided in the press release.
And now with that introduction, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Scott.
Scott Thompson
Thank you, Aubrey. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on our first quarter 2024 earnings call. I’ll begin with some highlights from the quarter and then turn the call over to Bhaskar to review our financial performance in more detail. After that, I’ll provide an update on our proposed acquisition of Mattress Firm, which we expect to close by the end of the year. Lastly, I’ll open up the call for Q&A.
In the first quarter, net sales were approximately $1.2 billion, and adjusted EPS was $0.50. Our adjusted EBITDA was $198 million, consistent with the same period last year. These results are evidence of our strong competitive position in the market.
Turning to a few highlights. First, we continue to develop and launch high-quality bedding products in all the markets we serve. We are actively refreshing our US Tempur portfolio with our latest Adapt products. These products are designed to address the fundamental consumer need, alleviating aches and pains. They feature our most innovative Tempur material and are engineered to provide an impressive 20% improvement in pressure relief compared to standard material.
When our mattresses are combined with our proven range of smart adjustable basis, the result is a comprehensive advanced sleep system. The rollout of over 60,000 Adapt mattresses to retailers is on schedule and we expect to be substantially rolled out by Memorial Day.\
Early reports from our third-party retailers and our direct-to-consumer operations are strong. We also, to select national retailers, recently rolled out Active Breeze, our most customizable heating and cooling sleep system, priced at approximately $10,000 for queen and base set. This system caters to the discerning ultra-luxury consumer seeking cutting-edge sleep solutions, offering both active climate management and the benefits of Sleep Tracker AI.
Our third party retailers and our company-owned Tempur stores are reporting that the presence of this product on the showroom floors generates a halo effect propelling interest towards the top-tier offering of our Tempur lineup.
Although, still early in the rollout when bundled with additional products, the ACTIVEbreeze is driving some tickets upward of $20,000, while we anticipate modest sales volume for this ultra-premium product, it’s significant live in the elevating the brand perception and foreshadowing the future of bedding innovation.
Please note that even with challenges like reduced brick-and-mortar retail traffic our innovative products are driving momentum in the category.
Excluding the impact of floor models, our US average mattress sales prices across all brand products increased mid-single-digits and our attach rate increased double-digits year-over-year, demonstrating the consumers’ willingness to spend on innovative quality products designed to provide better night sleep.
New products are also building momentum in our International business. Our new product collection features consumer-centric innovation and an expanded price range that meets the needs of a broader spectrum of customers. In the first quarter, we executed the launch of our all-new Tempur mattresses bed bases and pillows in the UK and are now fully rolled out worldwide.
We also optimized the new Tempur mattress beds construction to facilitate a higher level of customization while streamlining the manufacturing process, allowing us to effectively meet the unique demands of consumers across various markets and channels.
Second highlight, we invested in compelling marketing to support our brands and products. We continue to be balanced with our media strategy focusing both on broad-based and targeted digital outlets to meet consumers throughout their purchase journey. In North America, we developed new creative design to drive consumers’ interest in the category and our recently launched Tempur products.
In the first quarter, we introduced a new ad focused on the Tempur-Pedic Ergo ProSmart base and its exclusive SoundScape mode feature, which delivers an immersive relaxation experience designed to help people who have trouble following sleep. These ads are already resonating with consumers in driving attach rate and ASP expansion for our retail partners.
In the second quarter, we continue to support these lineups with our new targeted TV spots and digital assets focused on illustrating how the Adapt collection provides a solution to one of the leading barriers to quality sleep, aches and pains. Our consumer research shows that these new assets are our highest scoring ads to-date and we’re excited to put this new content into the market.
We also continue to invest in advertising to support our Stearns & Foster products with engaging messages that reinforces the superior comfort, quality and craftsmanship is the hallmark of the brand for over 175 years.
As has been the case with our successful Tempur-Pedic advertising, our recent investments in Stearns & Foster have also been successful, helping the brand to achieve excessive year-over-year growth in consumer traffic to stearnsandfoster.com every year since we first introduced the television advertising in 2021.
And in 2023, helping the brand to achieve the industry’s highest year-over-year growth in Google Search. Internationally, we continue to increase our marketing investments to support the positive momentum of our recently launched new Tempur product range. Our creative assets highlight the many benefits of the latest generation of Tempur materials, covers all retail assortments and reaches all relevant media channels.
We continue to see positive results with uplift in awareness, share of search, web sessions and retail traffic. Our market intelligence reaffirms that we are outperforming the market in a challenging retail environment. We recently announced the signing of David Beckham as our newest brand ambassador, for our key markets in the high-growth Asia Pacific region. The campaign consists of television assets, content for our online channels and point-of-sale material for our own stores and retail partners. The campaign launched in March in Australia. We’ll also go log in our other Asia Pacific subsidiaries later this year, and we will host an event with David Beckham and key retail partners in China during the second quarter.
Our advertising efforts worldwide are designed to break through to consumers at all points in their purchase journey, driving near term sales, while also continuing to build long-term support for our brands. Our research shows that our brands continue to be top of mind for consumers seeking high-quality sleep solutions.
Third highlight, we continue to expand and optimize our diverse omni-channel distribution platform to meet the consumer wherever they want to shop. Our brands and private labels continue to gain traction in the Wholesale segment across existing and new distribution channels. In the first quarter, we expanded our OEM relationship with a large specialty betting retailer. And in April, we expanded our products into additional big-box stores with one of the largest U.S. bedding retailers.
Consumers are also engaging with our product through our company-owned stores and e-commerce presence. Our North American direct channel performance was solid in the quarter, delivering a robust 8% sales growth year-over-year driven by strength in our e-commerce business.
Finally, we continue to drive year-over-year improvements in costs through sourcing and operational efficiencies. During the quarter, our operations team focused on enhancing supply contracts, improving labor productivity and optimizing logistics. These efforts, combined with the impact of normalizing commodity prices resulted in a 270 basis point benefit to the North America first quarter adjusted gross margin and 130 basis point benefit to International’s first quarter adjusted gross margin.
With that, I’ll turn the call over to Bhaskar to provide more detail.
Bhaskar Rao
Thank you, Scott. As mentioned, in the first quarter of 2024, consolidated sales were approximately $1.2 billion and adjusted earnings per share was $0.50. There are approximately $18 million of pro forma adjustments in the quarter, all of which are consistent with the terms of our senior credit facility. These adjustments are primarily related to costs incurred in connection with our planned acquisition of Mattress Firm.
Turning to North American results. Net sales declined 2% in the first quarter. On a reported basis, the wholesale channel declined 3% and the direct channel grew 8%. North American adjusted gross margin improved 160 basis points to 39.5% driven by commodities and operational efficiencies partially offset by changeover costs to support new OEM distribution and product launch costs. North American adjusted operating margin was consistent to the prior year at 15.3% driven by improvement in gross margin offset by investments in growth initiatives.
Now turning to international. International net sales were consistent year-over-year on a reported basis and declined 2% on a constant currency basis. As compared to the prior year, our International gross margin improved 140 basis points to 55.4% driven by commodities and operational efficiencies. Our International adjusted operating margin improved 20 basis points to 15.5% driven by the improvement in gross margin partially offset by investments in growth initiatives.
Now moving on to balance sheet and cash flow items. At the end of the first quarter consolidated debt less cash was $2.5 billion and our leverage ratio under our credit facility was 2.85 times within our historical target range of two times to three times. We generated record first quarter operating cash flow of $130 million, an improvement of $30 million year-over-year.
We have already started to execute elements of our strategy to finance the Mattress Firm transaction, which is consistent with our history of balancing financial flexibility, leverage and cost of capital. We successfully expanded and extended our credit facilities in late 2023 and executed a delayed draw term loan in the first quarter of 2024.
We anticipate raising incremental borrowings closer to the closing of the transaction and expect net leverage after closing to be between 3 times and 3.5 times, assuming a closing in the second half of 2024. We expect to return to our target leverage ratio range of two times to three times in the first 12 months after the closing.
Now turning to 2024 guidance. Consistent with previous expectations, we expect adjusted EPS to be in the range of $2.60 to $2.90. At the midpoint of the range, this represents a robust 15% growth rate year-over-year in a challenged market.
Our guidance is based on sales increasing low to mid single digits versus 2023. This also considers our expectation that the US bedding industry unit volumes are flat to slightly down versus the prior year, which implies headwinds in the first half and some recovery in the second half of 2024.
Our sales outperforming the industry due to recently won distribution in the US and the continued success from new product launches. Advertising spend of approximately $500 million as we continue to support our leading brands and new products. All of this resulting in adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1 billion at the midpoint of the range.
Our guidance also considers the following allocations of capital in 2024, CapEx approximately $150 million down significantly from the prior years as our major capital projects are complete. This is a more normalized level of spend driven by maintenance CapEx of $110 million and growth CapEx of approximately $40 million; and a quarterly dividend of $0.13, an increase of 18% over prior year.
Lastly, I would like to flag a few modeling items. For the full year 2024, we expect D&A of approximately $200 million to $210 million. Interest expense of approximately $135 million to $140 million. On a tax rate of 25% and with a diluted share count of 179 million shares.
With that I’ll turn the call back over to Scott.
Scott Thompson
Thank you, Bhaskar. Before opening the call for questions, let me provide a brief update on our pending acquisition of Mattress Firm. As previously announced in the fourth quarter of 2023, we certified substantial completion with the Federal Trade Commission’s second request. We continue to work with the FTC to advance the transaction’s approval process and anticipate the FTC to complete its review in the second quarter.
As previously disclosed, we continue to expect the transaction to close in mid to late 2024. In connection with and contingent upon this acquisition, we are proactively pursuing a divestiture plan. We are also engaged with numerous Mattress Firm suppliers on post-merger supply agreements. I’m pleased to share that six of the seven suppliers, we’ve offered post-closing supply agreements, have successfully negotiated and executed a win-win agreement with us.
Lastly, a brief comment on Mattress Firm’s financial performance. Mattress Firm recently made their quarterly results available on their website. We encourage you to review Mattress Firm’s website for more information on their financial performance for the most recent quarter, which we believe was consistent to slightly ahead of the U.S. industry trends.
In summary, we’re making good progress on closing the proposed transaction and we look forward to joining with the Mattress Firm team.
And with that, I’ll open up the call for questions. Operator?
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we will take our first question from Susan Maklari with Goldman Sachs.
Susan Maklari
Thank you. Good morning everyone.
Scott Thompson
Good morning Susan.
Susan Maklari
Good morning. Scott I wanted to talk a little bit about how you’re thinking of the year coming together. I think coming into 2024 the expectation was that earnings in the first half would be driven more by margin recovery, while the top line was still perhaps a bit soft and then seeing some recovery in the volumes in the second half. I know you mentioned in your prepared remarks you continue to expect that.
I guess can you talk a bit about what gives you the confidence that we will see that second half improvement in the volume? And any thoughts on the puts and takes to how the earnings may come together as we move through the balance of the year now that we’re one quarter in?
Scott Thompson
Sure. Thank you for that very short and simple question. Look when we look at it, the first thing that you asked about the confidence in the back half, quite frankly the comps get easier. That’s probably one of the biggest things is with the comps in the back half are much easier than in the front half. Also, when we look at our products that have been launched, they’re resonating in the marketplace and they should have momentum, both from an international and a domestic standpoint. We also obviously had good margin performance this quarter. I expect that we’re going to have a positive gross margin performance throughout the year.
I guess the last thing I would kind of throw into your question is, if you look at the historical data and where the bedding industry is, I think everyone who had looked at that data and I’ll talk primarily about the US at this point that’s where the data is the easiest to look at is you’d have to say the bedding industry is in a depression and has been in one for a number of quarters. And so, it’s got to normalize at some point whether it’s this quarter or whether it’s a quarter out or two. There’s no reason to believe it wouldn’t normalize. There haven’t been any products or any changes or any structural changes and the need for mattresses. And we may be building up pent-up demand. I don’t know. It’s hard to always tell. But certainly, we’ve been bouncing around the bottom for a long time and it just seems very reasonable that we should begin to normalize into what I’d call relatively minor growth from an industry standpoint. And then quite frankly, even if the industry doesn’t deliver that growth as you know we’ve been a fairly robust market share gainer over a number of quarters. And we don’t see any reason why that won’t continue going into the back half of the year.
Bhaskar Rao
And Susan, as it relates to puts and takes from an earnings standpoint outside of the volume items as Scott mentioned again, some new distribution that we have in the US, products resonating and whatnot, we do have some margin drivers as well. If you think about gross margin we had some nice performance in the first quarter. As Scott mentioned, we’d expect margin expansion as we go throughout the year double tapping in a couple of those items. The operational efficiencies that we’ve been speaking about for some time now, we saw the green shoots in the back half of last year and we continue to see that in the first quarter. That should give us a benefit more in the first half, but in the back half as well. And the commodities have been a bit of a tailwind for us that we’d expect throughout the year as well.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Bobby Griffin with Raymond James.
Bobby Griffin
Good morning everybody. Thanks for taking my questions. I guess, I want to follow up there on gross margins really nice performance during the quarter on a consolidated basis as well on a segment basis. Can you maybe talk a little bit how some of the puts and takes played out? Did the launch costs as well as the new manufacturing facility startup costs play out as expected? Or did any of that cost gets shifted maybe into 2Q?
Bhaskar Rao
Bobby, it played out as expected. So we did indicate that from a new capacity standpoint specifically Crawfordsville is that would be in ramp mode and that that did happen very largely consistent with what we had imagined. As we get into the second quarter and beyond is, we will start seeing some revenue from the new distribution specifically in OEM that would offset that. Also four models, we did indicate from a phasing standpoint year-over-year, we’d have a little bit more in the first quarter than we did in the prior year and that played out as expected.
In the second quarter, we’ll have the continuation of Tempur, but largely in line from an expectation standpoint. So again, when you think about what the expectations for margin as we get throughout the year, those tailwinds will continue whether it be the things that we have under our control which is the operations group again hitting on all cylinders as it relates to driving productivity. And just as a reminder, once we get what we recoup what we – from the 2019 levels then we’ll go back to what we’ve historically had which is driving productivity out of those addressable COGS from a go-forward standpoint.
Scott Thompson
And Bhaskar, I mean to highlight, if I’m not mistaken I mean Crawfordsville was a little bit of a headwind.
Bhaskar Rao
That’s correct.
Scott Thompson
Gross margin in the first quarter. And even with that very strategic headwind, we still were able to step over it and deliver a solid gross margin performance.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Rafe Jadrosich with Bank of America.
Rafe Jadrosich
Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask on the share gains that you’ve been driving how do you think you performed versus the industry in the first quarter? And then along with that just the shelf space gains that you’ve made, can you just talk about the timing there? And if there’s additional white space in some of those retailers?
Scott Thompson
Sure. And let me start out by saying the information is not perfect when you’re working in this industry and market share and kind of guessing everybody performed. So this is kind of what I’ll call our best thinking is – and we’re talking about the US market primarily, when we talk about this. So if you look at like information you get about springs and if you look at other data, you would perceive that the industry was down what do you think Bhaskar, double-digits from a sales standpoint call it 10% for rounding?
Bhaskar Rao
Yes Scott.
Scott Thompson
So round it to 10%, okay for the first quarter. And then you know, we’re a pretty good size of the market. And you can see we’re down call it 2% to 3%. So you can do a little bit of math and say, what was everybody else down. And you should probably come up with everybody else excluding us, would have been down probably close to 15% in the first quarter.
So as a preliminary look and based on the data we have today, I would say call it 3% call the rest of the industry 15%, down would be kind of how we would quantify the share gains. Then you asked specifically, white space, shelf space. Our gains come in two pieces. And the most important piece is slot velocity for what we’ll call it the installed base, how fast do we get sales from the installed base. And that’s where the lion’s share of share gains come from, because we’re fairly well distributed.
But yes, there is still some white space. And there’s at least a couple that come online in the second quarter which would be new space we’ll call it. And they were not in the first quarter and they’ll come in the second quarter. Then you asked about okay after that there’s some more. Yes, there’s still several other white spaces to work on. But really the secret to we’ll call it share gains and future success is slot velocity and making what we’ve got in the marketplace more productive both for us and for the retailers. That’s a win-win. When we’re talking about the US. If you talk about internationally, there’s a lot more white space in the international market where we’re not as well distributed across the world and every country is different.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Peter Keith with Piper Sandler.
Peter Keith
All right. Good morning, everyone. Thank you. Just regarding the FTC decision, I guess I was curious on what gives you confidence on predicting the timing of that by the end of the second quarter?
Scott Thompson
Yeah. If you look at and this goes back to the original disclosure of the transaction and first of all let me say we’re on our original timeline, that we originally disclosed when we started this journey or gauntlet ever how you’d like to describe it.
And it’s based on, we’ve always said, look, if we need to go through litigation, we’ll go through litigation. And we’ve always kind of put that in the budget from a timing standpoint, because we’re very comfortable if that’s the road that we need to take.
We clearly have given the FTC additional time, because those conversations have been constructive and productive. We’re dealing with high-quality people, who are taking their job very seriously and learning more and more about the industry. And we think the more they learn about the industry, that’s more likely that we’ll have the meeting of the minds.
But there’s certainly, no guarantees and we’re certainly not finished yet. But the timing framework has always been we assumed that we would have litigation and win through litigation.
But I think the most important thing when we started the process was, it was important to do this what I’ll call right and get the right answer, as opposed to just maybe do it fast. And we’re using that principle as we work through with the FTC in all areas.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Seth Basham with Wedbush.
Seth Basham
Thanks. Two-part questions, if you don’t mind. First a follow-up on your response regarding FTC, if we do need to litigate this do you still expect to be able to close the transaction this year? And then secondly, regarding your sales trends in the quarter, can you give us a little bit of perspective on the cadence and then how the second quarter started off? Thank you.
Scott Thompson
The answer to your first question is, yes. We still would expect to be able to close it within this calendar year. On cadence, I’m going to break up the cadence question in kind of two buckets which I don’t normally do. But this time, I think the two buckets kind of differed a little bit.
There is a cadence of sales at retail okay, call those end user sales. And then there’s a cadence of sales wholesale, on how we get orders. And as I think if you go back and listen to the fourth quarter earnings call in Jan, when we disclosed it last time, we were getting mixed messages.
So if you look at it from a retail perspective, end user there’s no question that January was a tough market in the U.S., so one because January was tough; and two because of weather. Then February was positive. And I think probably comped positive February over February and was obviously a holiday period.
And then I think March was down at retail. Then moving to the beginning of the second quarter, I would say that retail sales were flattish is what it feels like. Again, information is not too precise.
If you’re talking about our orders and our sales, we’ll call it wholesale, we were actually up in January and started the quarter slightly positive as I think probably retailers were stocking up in anticipation of President’s Day, then our orders kind of flattened out we’ll call it, in February as they kind of were working through the stock and they were slightly down in March and then have picked up and are flattish in April, again in a non-promotional period.
And although flat is not a word I particularly like, I like it better than down. I like things that are different than flat to go up. Actually flat in our orders, in a non-promotional period would be better than we’ve experienced over the last call it three or four quarters. Generally the trends have been during non-promotional periods, orders have been slightly negative and then they’ve been positive during promotional periods. So I don’t know if it’s a green shoot or not, but that’s the best information we have as of today.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Michael Lasser with UBS.
Michael Lasser
Good morning. Thank you so much for taking my question. Is your sales instead of being up low to mid-single digits this year are down low to mid-single digits, what would that mean for your profitability? And also if the transaction does not go through, can you give us a sense of how aggressively you would be in buying back your stock? Thank you.
Scott Thompson
Sure. Bhaskar and I will both work on that a little bit. I think first on the sales standpoint, it matters where the sales are. If the decline is in we’ll call it starter beds, entry-level product. That margin is not very high and probably is not too significant. If that decline is in high-end beds primarily Tempur, it would be very noticeable.
Why don’t you want to give them a little bit more around that Bhaskar then I’ll take the capital allocation.
Bhaskar Rao
Absolutely. So generally the way I thought about the business within certain confines meaning within a certain band as I thought about our incremental or decremental being somewhere around 30% to 35%. So as Scott mentioned, if it comes from the value let’s call it the value price points. It would be let’s call it something lower than the 30% to 35%. If it’s coming from the luxury brands whether it be Stearns & Foster or Tempur, it is going to be something north of that. So let’s call it 40-ish above if it was in the those luxuries and if it was in the same kind of quantum if you get in those value price points.
Scott Thompson
And I think the second part of your question could just squeeze two in one was what will we do in the unfortunate case of the Mattress Firm transaction were not to close. We clearly would be overcapitalized and we always do, which we would look to deploy that capital in a way that has a high return on invested capital, probably because of the size of the amount of money we will have accumulated, the vast majority would end up probably in share repurchase but that would be dependent on opportunities and stock price.
But probably if you ask me today that would that’s going to end up in share repurchase would be my guess. It will be a Board decision. And the velocity of that will depend on the price of stock and it will probably depend on the outlook and the uncertainty in the economy. But under a fairly reasonable period of time we would want back in line with our, what we think is more of our leverage target, which is two to three times. So we would probably be pretty quick, but again it would be dependent on factors like stock price and economic outlook.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Brad Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Brad Thomas
Thanks. Good morning. I wanted to ask about advertising. And Scott as we’re out talking to retailers, we continue to hear that Tempur is the most successful with its advertising and a share of voice. And so I was just wondering if you could comment number one, do you think there could be any changes on the horizon from a competitive standpoint in terms of your competitors trying to lean in and be more effective advertising this year?
And then just as you think about the upcoming election, are there any nuances that we should think about, in terms of your ad plans this year? Thanks.
Scott Thompson
We would be thrilled, with our competition updating their advertising. I would — I think that actually would be a net positive certainly, to the industry and to us, because I think the biggest problem and I’ve talked about it before on open mic, is getting people in the funnel. And I think that’s why, the unit decline is so drastic this time in what is a minor downturn in the US industry — in the US economy. So, I hope so. I would love to see all the manufacturers, do more top of the funnel advertising and pull their weight to help retailers, biggest problem retailers have which is floor traffic. And I think that’s part of our responsibility as manufacturers to help drive traffic into the store.
So, I haven’t seen anything, but I think some retailers are putting pressure on other manufacturers to kind of “get in the game.” So, we’re hoping there’s a change there. As far as the advertising market and the elections, there will be certain markets where it will be a completeness. Pricing at times gets, a little bit weird. We’ve accounted for that in our thinking on our guidance, but it’s always a little weird, when there’s an election. But we – hopefully, we’ve got that covered. Certainly, we’ve been planning for it for more than a year.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Keith Hughes with Truist.
Q – Keith Hughes
Thank you. A question is on international. Can you talk about, how the year is shaping up in terms of the guidance, the comps there just to be a bit harder, than what you have in North America?
Scott Thompson
You want to take that Bhaskar?
Bhaskar Rao
Absolutely.
Scott Thompson
Is it harder? I don’t think it’s harder, is it?
Bhaskar Rao
Well, what I would say is — you can answer that two different ways. One way is, I would think about in the first half, we did have four models that we have to comp over. However, when you think about the back half of 2020 – 2023, those four models weren’t there. However, we did see some growth. So, what does all that mean? As I think about the international and let’s call it, outside of Dreams is, the products have resonated with the consumer and we have effectively wrapped up that launch, in the United Kingdom. And our expectation is, is that the growth rate that we saw exiting in 2023, is that would continue as we get into 2024. So call that mid- to high single digit, from a growth rate standpoint. When I just — when I pan across international, just from a geo standpoint, the international market is as from a macro standpoint, is as interesting as the US. And however with all that is that, our business continues to outperform the competitive set.
Scott Thompson
Yes. I think the way, I think the international business, we’ve got some great products in the marketplace that we’ve got a lot better slot velocity, and there’s a lot more white space. So, that feels good. The only call out would be and you mentioned it a little bit, was dreams. Dreams does have tougher comps. And in the UK, retail market is worse than it was last year in the bedding section. So that one’s a little bit choppy, but the traditional Tempur business around the world feels like, it’s got some really good momentum.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Phillip Blee with William Blair.
Q – Phillip Blee
Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to I wanted to piggyback on an earlier question here. Can you talk about your sales assumptions for brand beds [ph] for the remainder of the year? Should we expect this mix to remain relatively consistent? And then how did that compare performance in the first quarter? And then how should we think about mix shift impact on gross margin throughout the remainder of the year under those assumptions? Thank you.
Scott Thompson
Okay. I’ll start the top and then detail, so you can have time to think through that.
Bhaskar Rao
Thank you.
Scott Thompson
Look, if you look at the first quarter, the higher ASP beds did better than the lower ASP beds. And the brand that obviously did the best is Tempur and grew and then turns would be in the middle. And then Sealy had some pressure on it and was negative in the first quarter, and that’s been kind of the trend. Going forward, that’s where I’ll look at Bhaskar and let him go. What do you want to talk about?
Bhaskar Rao
Absolutely. So when you think about the first quarter, the uniqueness of it is that we have new distribution that we’re very excited about really that begins in the second quarter and beyond. And just as a reminder that new distribution is through our OEM channel. So when you think about what’s going to be different from the rest of the year versus the first quarter is I would think about that OEM mix. Again, what we’ve said, we’ve highlighted on open mics is, on an annualized basis, that’s about $100 million of revenue. We’re not going to get all that in the current period. Think of that happening from Q2 through the end of the year.
However, when you think about mix overall and being a gross margin driver is that’s not going to show up in a bridge. And the way I think about that is when you think about that revenue mixing in, as Scott said, with the Tempur and the Stearns & Foster business, it’s not a big needle mover. Also what that OEM does for us is it’s more units through a plant which makes every other unit cheaper.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will take our next question from Laura Champine with Loop Capital.
Laura Champine
Thanks for taking my question. It’s a follow-up on the international business, which did decelerate sequentially. It seemed like that deceleration was worse in the direct business. I’m wondering if that might have to do with higher price points in that segment of your business. But just any color you can give us about the decel on the international side would be helpful.
Bhaskar Rao
Laura, great double tap. So here’s the way I would answer that. If you think of the, let’s call it, legacy international business, which is everything outside of Dreams. If you go from 4Q to 1Q and you were to remove the impact of the floor model comp, the growth that we saw in the fourth quarter, that momentum continued in the first quarter. So no deceleration there. The one — the item I would call out is, as Scott mentioned, is the UK market.
The market is when you think about the totality of the world and what geos are more than others is the UK market is going through something. And we still continue — Dreams continues to perform well and performed outsized from an outperformance standpoint versus the competitive set. However, it’s a highly competitive market.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from William Reuter with Bank of America.
William Reuter
Hi. I just have one. In terms of the weakness you’re seeing, that the US is seeing in existing home sales, when you’ve looked at existing home sales historically what do you think that the correlation is between that data and your sales? And do you think we really need that to pick up to see a little bit of a rebound?
Scott Thompson
Yes, and no. We think about housing is, it’s either a little bit of a headwind or a little bit of a tailwind. It would be helpful if there were more housing formation. I don’t have an exact percentage or correlation number. But it’s probably — housing starts are probably in the top — sure top five, maybe top three things we look at. But really consumer confidence is — would be number one. And number two would be things like innovation quality of advertising that stimulates demand. And then you’d probably bump into housing maybe number three or number four. So what I’ll call a slight uptick in housing or a slight downtick in housing, isn’t something that we feel a lot of, but we would rather more housing formation than not. So I don’t think we have to have it. especially considering the low level we’re working from. But it would certainly be helpful.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our next question from Bobby Griffin with Raymond James.
Bobby Griffin
Hey, guys. Thanks for letting me jump back in here. Just wanted to quickly ask on 2Q. Anything you want to call out as we think about the model, I know we still have some carryover in the new product launch costs. And then with the new distribution wins is the timing of those pretty clean for the quarter were — I mean I think that would imply North America revenue could flip positive if the industry stays about the same. Is that fair? Or am I thinking about it wrong?
Bhaskar Rao
No, great question, Bobby. So the way I would think about that is let’s call our expectation for the second quarter on a consolidated basis would be let’s call it flattish. The call out there, you’re exactly right from an OEM standpoint we dosed that new distribution. That will spark in the second quarter and then from the back half of the year continue to gain momentum. When you think about the uniqueness of the second quarter on a year-over-year basis is there was a fair amount of floor models that flowed in 2Q of 2023. And think about that as about a 3% headwind. So when you think about on a consolidated basis what would our growth be without those four models? Absolutely reasonable that we would see some growth. However, all in, the expectation is, is that we would be flattish.
If I just do a little bit more landscaping from a P&L standpoint, the gross margin is that we would continue to, on a year-over-year basis is we would continue to expand in the normal seasonality that you’d see from going from Q1 to Q2. And then as you think about the advertising, it’s a big period. We’ve got Memorial Day and the timing of the 4th, some of that spend gets pulled into Q2. So advertising, as we called out, is we’re going to make some investments in there, not only to support our retailers in this very important period, but also the new products that we have, the Adapt in the U.S. as well as what we’re doing internationally.
Operator
Thank you. And we will take our last question from Brad Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets.
Brad Thomas
Hi. Thanks a lot letting me get back in here. Two quick follow-ups here. Maybe Scott, wondering if you could talk a little bit about — once the Mattress Firm deal closes, assuming it goes as planned, a little bit what year 1 looks like for you? And then Bhaskar, in case I missed it, did you give us an update on commodity and raw material inputs in the year? Thanks so much.
Scott Thompson
I think that’s a great question that I’m not going to answer. Look, we have — we’re not going to roll out too much detail on the first year business plan until things are a little more set and set. Other than to say, we believe that, that business unit would run separately and decentralized. But we’re going to keep the plans and the forecast and the accretion detail and all that until we finish this little exercise we’re doing in D.C.
Bhaskar Rao
And Brad, as it relates to commodities and raw material assumptions, largely speaking, they’re consistent with how we entered the quarter. Just as a reminder, what we’re thinking is on a consolidated basis, gross margins would be up for the full year, call it, about 150-ish basis points and about, let’s call it, 50 or so basis points would come from that from commodities. When you think about what happened — and that remains as we sit here today.
As you think about commodities overall, and when I think about commodities, it’s everything from logistics to ocean cargo to traditional lumber, oil and whatnot or the oil derivatives, there’s been some puts and takes in that portfolio. However, largely speaking, it remains consistent when you think about it at the aggregate level.
Operator
Thank you. It appears that we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program over to Scott Thompson for closing remarks.
Scott Thompson
Thank you, operator. To over 12,000 employees around the world, thank you for what you do every day to make the company successful. To our retail partners, thank you for your outstanding representation of our brands. To our shareholders and lenders, thank you for your confidence in the company’s leadership and its Board of Directors. This ends the call today, operator. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. This does conclude today’s program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.
